Partners in Progress' deception on Panama City airport has only cost them our trust

Check the new WhoseFlorida for updates

Please feel free to use this information. I compiled these facts in response to the Partners in Progress statements about the Panama City Airport.
I sent it to the News Herald for publication but to date it has not been printed.
Regards,
Stan Rising

Their deception has only cost them our trust

I couldn’t agree more with Elaine L. Hubbard. “NASA Powered Boom” October 26, 2003.

NASA came to Huntsville, AL first, not the airport. Look at the total demographics of that area; it is not at all like ours. Why have the Partners in Progress tried to deceive us AGAIN.

Let’s deal with the facts, why would they say “The runways at Panama City/Bay County International Airport do not meet FAA safety standards by lacking the required 1000 ft safety areas on both ends of the runways. One of our safety areas is just 59 feet” When the FAA does not require it for our airport.

Title 14 CFR 139.3 defines a safety area as “a designated area abutting the edges of a runway or taxiway intended to reduce the risk of damage to an aircraft inadvertently leaving the runway or taxiway”.
The first RSA criteria were established by AC 150/5300-12 effective February 28, 1983. While AC 150/5300-12 specified that an RSA should be at least 500 feet wide and should extend 1000 feet beyond each end of the runway and was superseded by AC 150/5300-13 on September 29 1989.
FAA Order 5300.1F dated June 30 2000 “Modifications to Agency Airport Design, Construction and Equipment Standards” paragraph 6d states “Part 139, paragraph 139.309, requires runway safety areas to conform to current standards if construction, reconstruction, or significant expansion began on or after January 1 1988 to the extent practicable.”
Regarding the current FAA safety area policy the NTSB states “the Safety Board notes that FAA Order 5200.8 restates the FAA’s original plan to require improvements to substandard RSAs only as part of overall runway improvement projects and does not require RSAs to be proactively upgraded to the minimum standards established in AC 150/5300-13”.

Therefore, the requirement for a 1000 ft overrun does not apply to our airport.

Additionally, pilots of multi-engine aircraft must calculate a V1 or Decision Speed, the speed at which after accelerating with all engines, experience an engine failure and (1) stop the aircraft in the remaining runway (not overrun) or continue the takeoff and climb to 35 feet over the departure end of the runway.

Pilots taking off on runway 32 would probably take the latter choice, clean up the airplane over the bay and come back for a single engine approach and landing, something they practice all the time in the simulator.

Both of these runways are quite adequate for the type of aircraft servicing our community.

Why didn’t the proponents of the new airport and West Bay development choose to sell us on a positive approach like the Strategic Plan or West Bay Area Vision (both available on the Web) instead of printing false information and using scare tactics.


Stan Rising, Panama City
Pilot, USAF Retired
... posted 12/25/03

---------------------------------------

This article is copyrighted material, the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml . If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

 

Top    Home   What's New