Panhandle Citizens Coalition- 2002

Help support Whoseflorida

Panhandle Citizens Coalition articles from 2003 here

Check the new WhoseFlorida for updates


Governor's office reneges on earlier offer to meet with Panhandle Citizens Coalition (PCC); PCC reports major progress on airport and us 98 closure petitions ... 12/31/02

SummerCamp replay? The St. Joe company barrels ahead toward January 21 adoption hearing... 12/27/02

No Orlandos, Please 12/01/02

Growth Management Enforcement will return under McBride 10/28/02

Letter from McBride to Panhandle Citizen's Coalition states: Growth Management Enforcement will return under McBride 10/28/02

Panhandle Citizens Coalition announces launch of petition drive for Sopchoppy in Wakulla County to head off potential adverse impact on the community;  (complete text of press release) 10/18/02

ST. JOE COMPANY TO FACE THE VOTERS IN CARRABELLE-THEIR RESPONSE: FASTER AND MORE DEVELOPMENT; (complete text of press release) 9/28/02

Love the progress St Joe is bringing us or LEAVE 9/26/02
------reply from DK, posted 9/26

St. Joe company and governments ignore citizens: Panhandle citizens coalition opposes all St. Joe company projects, advances citizen initiatives in 4 cities and calls for referendum in Franklin County 9/23/02

Question is not whether state officials have the authority to slow down St Joe's development, but whether they have the courage...  9/19/02

Panama City Beach meeting on St. Joe annexation 9/13/02

How long a pause in planning does the Panhandle Citizens Coalition seek? 9/12/02
-------- PCC responds to this question 9/17/02

Letter to Department of Transportation Secretary Barry protesting approval to move Highway 98 9/12/02

PCC advances citizen initiatives and referendum 9/3/02

SAMPLE ORDINANCE RESOLUTION FROM PANHANDLE CITIZENS COALITION  8/27/02

Initial Press Release 8/27/02

 

updated 06/22/04

News Clips

See also:

St Joe's Great Northwest

Panhandle

Big Bend

Growth management

Environmental Update

Water management

JEB said, JEB did

Plundering Florida

Dep't Community Affairs

Dep't of environmental Protection

 

 

 

GOVERNOR'S OFFICE RENEGES ON EARLIER OFFER TO MEET WITH PANHANDLE CITIZENS COALITION (PCC); PCC REPORTS MAJOR PROGRESS ON AIRPORT AND US 98 CLOSURE PETITIONS

Panhandle Citizens Coalition (PCC) today criticized Governor Bush for his refusal to meet with the group after having previously agreed to have his office conduct a session on growth management issues of urgent concern to residents in the Panhandle region. The group urges the Governor to reconsider and meet personally soon with PCC in order to dispell his image as being unconcerned about reckless growth.

"Before the election we asked to meet with Governor Bush to discuss growth issues, including the US 98 closure in Gulf County and the Department of Community Affairs approval of the Bay County Sector Plan which includes the proposed new Airport." said John Hedrick, Chair of PCC.

"On behalf of the Governor, his office issued a letter saying he was too busy at that time to meet with us and delegated the meeting to a staff person. Now this person has reneged on that pledge and, of course, the election has come and gone. These issues have not gone away and the Governor needs to aggressively address the regional impacts of the massive development plans of the St. Joe Company and others in the Panhandle. All across the state, alarms are going off concerning overdevelopment, water shortages, urban sprawl, and development encroaching on environmentally sensitive lands but what has the Governor done? So far, not much. We are left to wonder whether the interagency task force set up by the Governor before the election, to address development issues throughout the state, was just window dressing." said Hedrick.

"PCC is in high gear with the petition drive on the new Panama City airport. We are receiving considerable support from the public and have passed the halfway point. Currently, we have around 1,400 signatures out of the 2,250 needed to force the election, which will occur this spring. This petition would basically require the moving of the airport to be approved by the voters in Panama City before it could occur."

"PCC has also collected over 800 signatures of voters in Gulf County who oppose closing coastal US 98 for the benefit of the St. Joe Company; between all the past public meetings on this issue, the public has been overwhelmingly against moving US 98. This is not a done deal. " said Hedrick.

PCC has launched 12 initiatives/petitions in 3 counties (Franklin, Gulf, Bay) and 5 cities (Sopchoppy, Carrabelle, Port St. Joe, Panama City and Panama City Beach) aimed at giving citizens the control of growth and developments at the local level by calling for citizen referenda on issues such as provision of water and sewer service and location of key infrastructure, such as airports and highways. 

Finally, PCC stated that the St. Joe Company still has not agreed to debate them on the proposition that all St. Joe Company's current projects are what the citizens of the Panhandle really want. "The issues we raise will not go away and St. Joe Company's evading of a debate as the new year goes on will cast a bad light on their claims of benefits for the community. What they really are doing is trying to make as much money as possible while not caring about the impacts on current Panhandle residents. Impacts of development must be offset by benefits. Local jobs are not automatically created by development. PCC is not against all development but rather for a more collaborative approach to development that takes into consideration the existing character of, and long-term effects on, a community. We favor the local citizens making the choices about where, how and if development should occur to preserve the outstanding quality of life in the Florida Panhandle." 

SummerCamp replay? The St. Joe company barrels ahead toward January 21 adoption hearing 

Panhandle Citizens Coalition (PCC) urges denial until Franklin Comprehensive Plan updated; PCC calls upon the St Joe company to debate whether their proposed projects reflect the vision of Panhandle citizens, the company dodges

Ignoring calls from citizens, the Panhandle Citizens Coalition (PCC), and others, to wait until after Franklin County's Comprehensive Plan is updated, the St. Joe Company has chosen to request and the Franklin County Commission has scheduled the adoption hearing for the SummerCamp Comprehensive Plan Amendment for January 21st at 10:30AM.

"There remains many unanswered questions and concerns about this project, even after the St. Joe Company responded to the Department of Community Affairs (DCA) Objections, Recommendations and Comments on the SummerCamp project," said John Hedrick, Chair of PCC.

"The St Joe Company has failed to establish a need for this project that is consistent with the Franklin County Comprehensive Plan. Nor have they proven this environmentally sensitive site is suitable for the proposed development. There is no identification of who is going to build, operate and maintain the public facilities identified in the plan amendment (sewer and public safety). This project has been"planned" (and I use that term loosely) in isolation instead of in relation with other projects," said Hedrick.

"Why is the County even considering approving this development when on the other hand they state there is a need to develop a specific area plan for St. James Island? Even County Planner Alan Pierce noted "We don’t want to be amending a comp plan when we're in the middle of updating it." (Apalachicola Times, Nov. 28, 2002) This amendment will allow at least 11 piers, some of which will intrude into the Alligator Harbor Aquatic Preserve. According to the County's response to DCA, The Florida Natural Areas Inventory (FNAI) found 10 endangered, threatened or species of special concern species on or near this project. The Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission shows 26 listed species in or near the project. Suddenly, according to the response they have all disappeared? Who do you believe?"

"The concern for impacts on hurricane evacuation remains unresolved. Why hasn't DCA conducted an independent hurricane evacuation analysis? The closure of US 98 has only been temporarily deferred. The commercial development in this project, which is allowed 80% impervious surface, is adjacent to the FSU Marine Lab Facility. The Plan amendment will allow degradation of the Alligator Harbor Aquatic Preserve, a majority of which is open to shellfish harvesting. This project will destroy wetlands, natural habitat and sea grass beds."

"Folks, this is still a big development which includes a gated community of 499 dwelling units, 60 motel rooms, and 35,000 square feet of commercial structures. The St. Joe Company cares not about the concerns expressed by the average citizens of Franklin County of the potential impacts of this project, but prefers to rush ahead without proper planning and consideration, ignoring what the citizens want for their community.

At past meetings, most folks have said they would prefer no project to what the St.Joe Company has been proposing."

"At the very least, the project needs to be delayed until Franklin County has completely updated its Comprehensive Plan, the new plan has been approved by the voters, and St. Joe Company's project has been found to be in tune consistent with the new plan. We encourage all Franklin County citizens who oppose the current SummerCamp project to contact each of your county commissioners and tell them how you feel about this project, and turn out for the January 21st meeting to ensure this plan amendment is not adopted."

Approximately 300 people attended the first public hearing on the SummerCamp amendment at the Franklin County Courthouse in Apalachicola out of a population of around 15,000.

"The difficulties citizens have had with the St. Joe Company do not stop with Summercamp. The St. Joe Company strongly advocates for their projects but only under intense public pressure have they been willing to work with the community and only then minimally." said Hedrick "Given they feel so strongly about what they have proposed, Panhandle Citizens Coalition has have called upon the St. Joe Company to engage us in open debate, before a live audience with live television and radio with questions from the audience and call-ins, on the proposition that all St. Joe Company's current projects are what the citizens of the Panhandle really want. This 'shadow government', puppeteer behind the scenes, power behind the throne, call them what you want, they have to be held accountable to the citizenry and forcing them to defend/sell their position in the face of organized citizens who feel differently is the right thing to do. Debate is healthy for democracy," said Hedrick.

PCC first called on the St. Joe Company last week to debate when the company, for the first time known, appeared on public airwaves on the public radio show program "Rapline" (WKGC-FM, Panama City), but the Company dodged and evaded.

"The St. Joe Company will say they have had lots of public meetings and sessions with many members of the public, but all these sessions have had one goal in mind -- to sell the public on the validity of their plans and so far, increasingly, the public is saying 'no sale'. They are not attempting to seriously discuss and earnestly negotiate the composition of their developments with the public who will be most affected by them and when given the opportunity to do that by being first offered a Pause for Planning by PCC, their response was silence."


"The St. Joe Company would never have come on that show but for the pressure PCC has put on them over the past 4 months. They need to realize that building primarily second homes/resorts for the elite with virtually no local jobs created during construction and only low end service jobs after completion does not offer much benefit to the area. Neither does bringing in all the attendant problems with growth including urban sprawl, traffic congestion, hurricane evacuation, water pollution, higher taxes and housing costs; this is not what residents in the Panhandle want. Residents do not want to see Orlando, Miami or Tampa replicated in the Panhandle, but that seems to be what is on tap if unchallenged, given the size of all the St. Joe Company's developments and the accompanying public works, such as the proposed new Panama City airport and many new roads." said Hedrick.

PCC is a citizens organization comprised currently of 60 members but is supported in the efforts also by groups like the Florida Consumer Action Network, who has 40,000 members statewide. PCC's purpose is to provide citizen oversight of the development process to ensure fiscal, ethical, and environmental accountability and to safeguard the cultural heritage of the Florida Panhandle.

December 24, 2002 John Hedrick, 850-421-2483;  

Top

No Orlandos, Please 

A citizens group says it’s not anti-growth or anti-St. Joe, but the company is clearly its concern.
By Joan Hughes 

With development in the Panhandle accelerating as St. Joe Co. develops its massive holdings, a group of 40 concerned northwest Florida residents has formed the Panhandle Citizens Coalition with a goal of ensuring “fiscal, ethical and environmental accountability and safeguarding the cultural heritage of the region.” 
Chairman John Hedrick, a Tallahassee attorney, says St. Joe’s sheer size — almost 1 million acres in the Panhandle — makes it a focus of concern. The company has started to aggressively market its developments there, including WaterColor in Seagrove Beach, WindMark Beach in Port St. Joe and WaterSound in Camp Creek. 

“I grew up in Orlando,” says Hedrick, “and I saw the city before, during and after Disney” — a thinly veiled reference to St. Joe CEO Peter Rummell, who was once chairman of Walt Disney’s development division. Hedrick says he doesn’t want growth to bring the congested highways, overcrowded schools and uncontrolled sprawl that have plagued Orlando. 

PCC’s first action was a request that St. Joe, local governments and state agencies take a “pause for planning,” a period in which development and government approval of projects would be suspended. 

The idea, says Hedrick, was to allow citizens a comprehensive review of all St. Joe’s Panhandle projects “because no one has bothered to consider the cumulative impact of all these St. Joe projects with each other and with other major developments.” Neither St. Joe nor local governments responded. 

The coalition is now calling for initiatives in Port St. Joe, Panama City and Panama City Beach, as well as informal petitions in Franklin, Bay and Gulf counties, seeking voter approval of issues affecting major projects. The group has already gathered enough signatures in Carrabelle to force a referendum on two initiatives that will require voter approval of water and sewer service extension and repeal an ordinance that allows unlimited building heights. Both are intended to slow or prevent development. 

St. Joe spokesman Jerry Ray says the company is developing the area responsibly. He points to the 117,000 acres he says St. Joe has set aside in a conservation program, with another 150,000 earmarked. “Compare that to the 6,000 acres we plan to develop as residential,” says Ray. “We’re devoting 25% of our holdings to conservation.” 

While the PCC is skeptical, Hedrick insists it is not anti-St. Joe or even anti-growth. Instead, he says, the coalition supports what he calls “enlightened capitalism. We have to fight for responsible planning and responsible growth.” 
PRINTED FROM FLORIDA TREND MAGAZINE ONLINE, Talk of Florida, Around The State
Northwest, December 2002 
.... posted Jhedrick, 12/01/02

Top

The following was received and approved by the McBride campaign FYI. 

Growth Management Enforcement will return under McBride

Governor Bush has undermined the very integrity of the Growth Management Act by decreasing the role of the Department of Community Affairs.

Local governments and the business community need to know that there's a consistent and fair standard backing them up-the state oversight-applied to all local governments to enforce the laws in order to avoid costly urban sprawl.

In community after community, Jeb Bush's understaffed agency has been told to look the other way, while local governments are being forced to violate their own growth management laws, by aggressive urban sprawl projects that are potential disasters for local taxpayers.

(McBride/Rossin) will restore that fair and predictable statewide enforcement to protect our communities and back up those embattled planning professionals employed in public service of their local governments.

More later. John Hedrick, Chair, Panhandle Citizens Coalition; 10/28/02

Top

Friday October 18, 2002 

John Hedrick (850) 421-2483

PANHANDLE CITIZENS COALITION ANNOUNCES LAUNCH OF PETITION DRIVE FOR SOPCHOPPY IN WAKULLA COUNTY TO HEAD OFF POTENTIAL ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE COMMUNITY

Panhandle Citizens Coalition announced today that they are immediately beginning an initiative petition drive to amend the City of Sopchoppy's charter to prevent additional sewer and water service being provided outside of the city limits without the approval of the City's voters.

John Hedrick, Chair of Panhandle Citizens Coalition, made the announcement that was prompted by a published report in a Wakulla newspaper yesterday that the St. Joe Company is attempting to negotiate a deal with Sopchoppy for sewer and water service regarding their Summercamp development in Franklin County.

"Providing sewer and water service to the St. Joe Company will have a tremendous impact on Sopchoppy and Wakulla County. The St. Joe Company says they would pay for an expansion of the city's system but looking at their record of paying for impacts elsewhere leaves one to seriously question that commitment. Couple this with short-sighted politicians who cannot foresee the negative effects of unbridled growth and you have a prescription for disaster." said Hedrick

PCC began their petition drives when it became apparent that neither the St. Joe Company nor the affected local or state governments were going to enact a pause for planning on their own, which would have allowed time for adequate development and land use planning across the entire region. Without action by the citizens, their communities will be adversely impacted and their quality of life diminished.

"Now the city says it doesn't have the capacity to provide water to the St. Joe Company but could within a year. Does this mean Sopchoppy is overextending its water supply? Once you provide service to the St. Joe Company, they will always be competing for water and sewer resources with the citizens of Sopchoppy and Wakulla County. Will the Panhandle become like the rest of the state, where water is a limited resource. Are we going to start having water wars like the rest of the state?" said Hedrick.

The announcement of the potential charter change in Sopchoppy coupled with the retroactive provision that has been in other PCC petitions will send up a 'Red Flag" for developers that the outcome of a referendum could prevent the city from providing additional water and sewer outside the city without voter approval.

" We are not going to let the St. Joe Company do an end run and have the citizens subsidize their development. Where is this going to stop? Could Tallahassee be called upon again in this saga - after all, St. Joe Company's Southwood and Summercamp projects have been tied together on various issues already, notably the provision of a marina in the Summercamp area that would benefit Southwood owners. We can't let the St. Joe Company be the one doing the regional planning." said Hedrick.

According to the report, St. Joe Company has spent more than $2 million on wells, but came up with only one producing well and the water was bad.

"The move on Sopchoppy is a very significant development because it shows we are having an effect on the St. Joe Company since they are apparently no longer trying to negotiate with Lanark Village or Carrabelle for sewer and water service in the wake of our obtaining the necessary signatures on our petitions there." said Hedrick, who also stated that petitions for the 2 Carrabelle initiatives have now been verified by the Franklin County Supervisor of Elections.

"The citizens of our area are making progress in holding St. Joe Company accountable. We intend to be out in full force on election day gathering petition signatures as well as at a special election being held in Panama City Beach on November 12th. Trustfully, we will have in hand in the near future the necessary signatures to qualify all of our petitions for the various city ballots." said Hedrick

PCC has initiative petitions in the following cities Carrabelle, to repeal a Planned Unit Development ordinance which allows for unrestricted height and to prevent extending additional sewer and water service outside the city limits unless both the voters aprove and those same services are first offered to city residents; Port St. Joe, to prevent annexation into the city without approval of the voters and to prevent extending additional sewer and water service outside the city limits unless the voters approve; Panama City, to prevent moving the airport without the approval of the citizens and; Panama City Beach, to prevent annexation without approval of the voters and to prevent extending additional sewer and water service outside the city limits or to major development projects without voter approval.

PCC also has citizen petitions in Franklin, Gulf and Bay counties for the following purposes in Franklin, to have a pubPCC vote to stop amending the current comprehensive plan until the voters adopt a new plan; in Gulf, to have a public vote on whether to move US 98 and; in Bay, to have a public vote on moving the airport.

-30-

Top

Hello Fellow Activist,

Your website is fantastic and the Panhandle Citizens Coalition would be honored if you would post our information. ...

Keep up the great work!!

Panhandle Citizens Coalition

September 27, 2002                                     

ST. JOE COMPANY TO FACE THE VOTERS IN CARRABELLE-THEIR RESPONSE: FASTER AND MORE DEVELOPMENT; GOVERNOR BUSH BROADLY RESPONDS TO PANHANDLE CITIZENS COALITION; PCC CALLS ON BUSH AND McBRIDE TO MEET WITH THEM CONCERNING GROWTH AND OVERDEVELOPMENT WHILE SNARING MAJOR ENDORSEMENT AND POTENTIAL FOUNDATION SUPPORT; GOVERNOR BUSH PRESSED TO MEET CONCERNING PROPOSED CLOSING OF US 98 AND ILLEGAL ACTIONS REGARDING ST. JOE DEVELOPMENTS IN BAY COUNTY

In a stunning series of developments, the Panhandle Citizens Coalition announced today they had made their signature goals in Carrabelle for their citizen initiative referendums and are in a position to have their first elections on their initiative petitions held as early as this fall. In their response, according to PCC, St. Joe Company is accelerating their various development activities with announcements of more projects and speeding up of what has been already announced.

PCC also disclosed that they have made progress when Governor Bush just revealed a broad response to their recent Pause for Planning. The two major gubernatorial candidates will be invited to meet with PCC as soon as possible before the election to better flesh out their views on Growth and Overdevelopment.

The Florida Consumers Action Network (FCAN) has voted to support PCC's efforts to hold the St. Joe Company accountable, making it the first major statewide organizational endorsement. Additionally, PCC's innovative style and actions have attracted the attention of several foundations who could offer significant support as well.  Governor Bush was likewise pressed to meet with PCC right away on the proposed US 98 closure issue in Gulf County and the illegal actions which have just occurred regarding St. Joe Company developments in Bay County.

"We are pleased to announce that our members in Carrabelle and Franklin County have achieved the signature goals to put our twin initiatives on the ballot in the city of Carrabelle. We will now press to have this election held as soon as possible, either on the November general election or a special election, as well as push the Franklin County petition which bars amending their Comprehensive Plan until a new Comprehensive Plan is approved by the voters." said John Hedrick, Chair of Panhandle Citizens Coalition.

"In Carrabelle, a striking cross section of people signed the petition" said Pat Maier of PCC from Carrabelle. "Old-timers and newcomers, senior citizens and younger people-all are very concerned about the effects of overdevelopment on our community. The people of Carrabelle had requested a referendum back in June on the Planned Unit Development ordinance and was told by the mayor there will be no referendum. When your elected officials do not respond to the the citizens' requests, they have no choice but to take matters in their own hands, The citizens of Carrabelle did that with these ballot initiatives and we are hoping that other cities will do the same."

 

The initiatives, when approved by the electorate, will (1) bar the extension of water and sewer service outside the city limits unless both approved by the electorate and not until those same services are offered to all city residents and (2) repeal a Planned Unit Development ordinance which would have allowed unlimited heights in favor of restoring the building codes from Franklin County in effect on January 1, 2002.

"Both initiatives affect the St. Joe Company. One would limit their access to water and sewer services in Carrabelle, and the other would prevent them from annexation aimed at getting around height restrictions in Franklin County." said Maier.

"I am grateful to the PCC for helping to empower the citizenry of Carrabelle to have a chance to determine their own future. I hope this will translate into a model for other communities who may feel that the battle against overdevelopment that changes the fabric and character of their neighborhoods is a hopeless one." stated Jim Lycett, PCC member from Carrabelle.

 Hedrick also said all the other petition drives are well underway with people petitioning in Port St. Joe, Panama City and Panama City Beach.

"So what has St. Joe Company's response been to all our activity? Though there has never been an official response and of course they have published their propaganda in newspaper columns and advertising, the most tangible sign has been in their acceleration of their projects and their pushing for approval of new projects." said PCC.

She continued, "For examples, in Bay County just Tuesday the County Commission, in a patently illegal move, adopted the Sector Plan which paves the way for the proposed new airport. What makes it illegal is that the Comprehensive Plan was rewritten at the last minute with no opportunity for meaningful public review and without approval by the local planning agency, as required by Florida Statutes. Because the Department of Community Affairs appears to have abdicated their responsibilities in relation to Bay County, we call upon Governor Bush to intervene immediately in these matters and meet with us on them right away."

"In Panama City Beach just yesterday, their City Commission approved the annexation of over 2,000 acres of St. Joe Company property into their city, doubling the size of the city, while knowing we have our initiatives under way with that city and with the knowledge that this annexation is illegal because these lands are not urban in character, are not substantially contiguous to the municipal boundaries, and the area is not reasonably compact. This same type of annexation occurred with Port St. Joe and Windmark in Gulf County." 

"We have also discovered new developments which the St. Joe Company is pushing: a major new housing development in Bay County; a major expansion of the port facility in Port St. Joe which could dredge a 14 mile, 700 foot wide channel to a depth of 40 feet, and enlarge the port's size costing close to half a billion dollars; and a potential industrial park in Gadsden County. All these taken together indicate to us that St. Joe Company has put down the hammer and is going full speed ahead on development. The revelation of the port expansion gives further credence to our previous assertion that St. Joe Company has big plans they have not shared with the public." 

"Most significantly, Governor Bush has now finally reacted broadly to our request for the pause for planning." said Hedrick. "Quoting from the letter, 'While we believe that no legal authority is available to us, the Governor has asked the Department of Community Affairs, the Department of Environmental Protection and the Department of Transportation to institute an informal, inter-agency effort to develop and maintain a comprehensive and cohesive process to address the issues related to development in Florida. These three agencies have already begun the informal process to coordinate their actions, not only in northwest Florida, but statewide.'"

"Translation- Governor Bush created his position in response to our activities. And while his response is still inadequate--for example, they are not even using the authority available to them, and if they truly believe they don't have authority, why aren't they requesting they be given additional authority--this shows the interrelated issues of growth and overdevelopment have grown in importance enough so Governor Bush had to react and the issues now have become statewide campaign issues in all races in 2002. After all, most of the rest of the state has already experienced what the Panhandle now is just beginning to experience-growth and overdevelopment. It is in that light that we now are calling on both Jeb Bush and Bill McBride to meet with us as soon as possible so we can state our views on these matters and ascertain their positions on these important decisions." said Hedrick.

"PCC's clout has also been enhanced by our unsolicited but welcome endorsement from the Florida Consumer Action Network, a statewide consumer organization which has approximately 40,000 members, and supports our efforts to hold the St. Joe Company accountable. Foundation interest has also materialized and could also offer significant support."

"Finally, we have learned that the proposed US 98 closure in Gulf County has not been finally approved by the state Department of Transportation. To PCC's knowledge, there has been no other instance where the state has moved a public roadway to assist a specific developer to increase its profits. We are requesting an immediate meeting with Governor Bush to brief him on the outstanding environmental and other issues regarding this project, that local opposition is strong, and that moving this road would not be in the public interest and should be disapproved." said Hedrick.

"The Panhandle Citizens Coalition moves forward with renewed commitment to preserve fiscal, ethical, and environmental accountability and to safeguard the cultural heritage of the region." said Hedrick.

John Hedrick, 850-421-2483   
Pat Maier, 850-697-8732

Top

Give it a rest

 You people are absolutely crazy.
 As a person who has been here all of my life and grown up in Panama City Beach. I am appalled at the likes of Ms. Brown. Her disdain for progress and growth of the community is sick. 
If you don’t like the way things are going in Panama City ….LEAVE 
--- WES G,9/26/02

Dear WES G:
If you believe in democracy you'd have to support the idea that if we do not like the way things are, we have the right and duty as citizens to try to help change them instead of leaving, as you are suggesting. It is very disturbing to me to hear your suggestion as stated.
..regards, DK, 9/26/02


Top

Question is not whether state officials have the authority to slow down St Joe's development, but whether they have the courage... 

Dear Editor (Editorial in Tallahassee Democrat );

Your August 29, 2002, editorial, "Opponents of St. Joe use poor approach," reflects misunderstanding of the documented potential impacts of proposed major developments in the region as well as Panhandle Citizens Coalition's approach to persuading developers and government officials to take adequate time for the complex development planning process.

It is important to note at the outset that you agree with us the St Joe Company's projects will bring sweeping changes to the Panhandle and would obviously have a major impact on this region (paraphrasing your own words).  Our difference then appears to be over what approach should be taken to properly plan for the St Joe developments.

While PCC's concerns may be "too generic" for the Democrat's editorial board to judge, local and state government officials are quite familiar with the impact these large developments will have on water quality and quantity, sewage capacity, stormwater runoff, traffic, roads, hurricane evacuation routes and shelters (largely nonexistent in the most adversely impacted areas), schools, fire and police services, medical facilities, quality of life for current residents, low income families, and on and on.

When these concerns have previously been raised with both the St Joe Company and various local governments, neither have significantly altered St Joe Company's plans, despite hearing from numerous citizens wanting changes, thus, the reason for a different approach that is still working within the system.

These local governments also understand they do not have the funding to pay for improving infrastructure to support the proposed massive developments.  What's more, PCC does not think taxpayers should have to foot the bill to leverage profits for developers.

The editorial assertion that state officials do not have the authority to stop private development is inaccurate.  The courts have many times upheld the right of government entities to impose moratoria on development when warranted.  Extensive comments by state agencies on St Joe Company's various developments in the region, including the Department of Community Affairs report on SummerCamp in Franklin County, would more than justify a pause for adequate planning and development.

The question is whether our officials have the courage to do it.  Whose interests do top officials want to protect -- the general population or powerful corporations?  The electorate, or high-dollar campaign contributors?

Your assertion that the SummerCamp project is on hold until the Franklin comprehensive plan is overhauled is premature.  This status is subject to change at any time by the county commissioners, some of whom were quite willing to approve the development in the absence of an updated comprehensive plan. DCA has not asserted its authority regarding the expired plan.

Other projects, including the Bay County sector plan that encompasses 75,000 acres, are on fast-track for approval without necessary infrastructure and environmental provisions, including water quality protections.  Millions of dollars in public funds have already been spent on the proposed Panama City-Bay Airport relocation, while questions on whether this relocation is even necessary remain unanswered.

The editorial suggests we sit passively by and depend on officials who, at the local level have allowed special interests control planning, and at the state level, have weakened planning statutes and DCA oversight.  Countless other Floridians, especially in South Florida, are standing up to local governments and fighting bad development decisions.  The recent court decision that requires demolition of a $3.3 million apartment complex in Martin County because it was incompatible with nearby single-family homes was the result of ordinary citizens taking the initiative to stop bad development from destroying their community.

Panhandle Citizens Coalition does not accept business as usual.  We are working within the system in a different way, one that produces favorable results for the people, not those who have benefited from the way the system has previously worked.  We will not be intimidated by big corporations, developers, ill-informed media, or government officials in this battle to save the very life of the Panhandle.

Sincerely,

JOHN HEDRICK, Chair Panhandle Citizens Coalition,  johnhedrick13@yahoo.com
See: In Panhandle growth, coalition promotes interests of citizens
9/19/02

Top

Panama City Beach meeting on St. Joe annexation

"A representative from the Panhandle Citizens Coalition came forward to challenge the annexation, threatening to fight it if the city did not address the group's demands.

"A few other citizen voiced opposition to the council's action, citing everything from legal ads in The News Herald that they said were illegal, to land-use designations of the parcels if they were annexed. 

"Most of the parcels are adjacent to residential neighborhoods and would be zoned PB ---for professional/business. Residents of those neighborhoods were concerned that such zoning would lead to tall apartment buildings, condominiums, and commerce not right for a residential area. 

"The issue will come up for another public hearing on Sept. 26.   
Windy Booher, Article from 9/13/02 News Herald

Just how long a pause in development does the PCC seek?

Dear Sir:

One has to wonder how long a pause in planning the Panhandle Citizens Coalition seeks? As it is many of the members of this Coalition are the same ones that have stymied passage of a meaningful land use code for Bay County for nearly three years. Please understand that the same people who allege they "just want planned growth" have publicly voiced opposition to any growth. They have spoken out against every project that has been publicly considered in Bay County and Panama City Beach for the past two or three years and during this entire time they have yet to offer one constructive, positive suggestion.

Bay County needs the tax dollars that development of St. Joe's land will&! gt; bring. Without increases in tax revenue we can not extend sewer service to neighborhoods with leaking, aging septic tanks. We need to pave roads and treat storm water now before the damage to our Bay is irreversible. Pauses in planning and more hearings will eventually cause The St. Joe Company to shift their resources to other communities. We need to remember that they have vast holdings throughout Northwest Florida. If we allow this small band of professional opponents to continue to place stumbling blocks in front of St. Joe's efforts, we may, as a community, miss an opportunity to preserve large tracts of truly sensitive land and to make meaningful progress towards increasing our tax base.

This same group has adamantly opposed the redevelopment on Panama City Beac! h,! too. They have opposed replacing, aging, run down properties with safer, code complaint structures in the interest of "preserving the family image of our beaches." What they fail to tell you is that there is an underbelly to the status quo. Seedy, run down properties, attract seedy run down people. In one study we conducted, we found a direct correlation between the age of a motel and the number of police calls to the property. The older the motel the more police calls. In most cases the older motels cost the taxpayers more money in police and emergency calls than they generated in ad valorem or sales taxes combined. The deterioration in our quality of life, however, can never be measured when these criminals spill over into our nearby neighborhoods. A beautiful youn! g ! woman was murdered last year by a transient staying in an older motel on Panama City Beach. No one will ever be able to calculate the cost of that life to her family.

St. Joe has been gracious in its willingness to publicly air its plans and to attend endless public meetings. We need to set them free.

Sincerely, 
MKS, letter to The Editor Panama City News Herald Panama City, FL; 9/12/02

PCC response: "She Doth Protest Too Much"

The August 30 letter blasting the Panhandle Citizens Coalition presents a crude grab bag of propaganda, including half-truths, falsehoods and fear mongering. To suggest that good growth management leads to crime is ludicrous and irresponsible. It's enough to make one wonder whether certain developers are afraid of what will happen if more time and thought were put into planning development in Bay County.

First, a half-truth: The Coalition has been in existence less than two months and thus had no involvement in the Bay County code rewrite. The only truth here is that a Bay County member of PCC has actively followed the zoning issue, calling special attention to such deficiencies as high-rise commercial encroaching into neighborhoods -- coincidentally, a type of development in which the writer has a financial interest. Ironically, hurricane evacuation -- a critical human safety issue exacerbated by high-density projects -- is one concern that this citizen activist has consistently raised.

On to the fear-mongering: The letter suggests that daring to ask for a "pause for planning," which is proposed for a year or less and will affect only large-scale development, will upset the county's biggest landowner and cost Bay County tax revenues and opportunity. Such a viewpoint assumes that increased tax revenues will cover costs of development, an assumption that has yet to be shown on a county or regional cost-to-benefit analysis. Also, the Panhandle Citizens Coalition is calling for a region-wide pause for better planning and visioning, so the fear of losing business to a nearby county is unfounded.

As for constructive suggestions, the Panhandle Citizens Coalition does have a positive vision for a high-quality of life in which growth occurs in an orderly fashion and without putting undue strain on our natural resources, highways, and local budgets.

So often maligned as "special interests," environmentalists experience no personal gain from their efforts to preserve vestiges of wetlands, trees, and native landscapes. They sit through hours boring meetings, doggedly dig up facts, and follow legal notices that most people have no time to think about -- unless they have a financial interest in the matter at hand.

Often, environmentalists are the only ones who show up at meetings where momentous decisions are made, to voice concerns about neighborhood as well as environmental preservation. The real special interests are those who pay professionals to fight codes and reasonable watchdogging of growth. 

The Panhandle Citizens Coalition works to protect our communities as a whole, including our small businesses that will suffer if poor development decisions drive away the tourist trade. Through adequate community planning, we seek to encourage development that will attract larger employers with high-paying jobs, but that will also preserve our environment and quality of life.  
John Hedrick, Chair, Panhandle Citizens Coalition, Tallahassee

Top

Letter to protest moving Highway 98 in Franklin County

This is a letter sent to Department of Transportation's Secretary Barry on Monday September 9th:  (no response as of 9/12/02 )

Thomas Barry, Secretary
Florida Department of Transportation
605 Suwannee St
Tallahassee FL 32399-0050

Dear Secretary Barry/Tom;

We understand the pending approval for realignment of US Highway 98 in Gulf County, at the proposed St Joe Company Windmark development, is imminent.  We believe approval of this project at this time is very premature and ultimately not warranted.  This position is based on several factors.

The public has been precluded from the opportunity to make meaningful input into this project because we have been unable to obtain copies of St Joe Company's consultant's responses to all agency questions.  There are outstanding environmental issues related to this project, including severe impacts on Federal protected species and habitat and field survey techniques.

It is our understanding the field survey's were conducted by PBS&J, a regular consultant for the St Joe Company.  We find this very disturbing in that a continuing relationship of this sort creates an obvious conflict of interest.

I am sure that you are aware of the high number of Port St Joe Citizens who expressed public opposition to closing this public road, and especially for the purpose of increasing the profits of one particular private entity -- the St Joe Company.  We are unaware of any precedence where a public roadway has been moved for the express purpose of allowing a specific development; and in this case, a development that will severely impact public health and safety during hurricane evacuation. 

We request at the very least that you delay approval of this project until such time as all the various agency questions are answered to your satisfaction by an independent consultant and that an opportunity for meaningful public input is afforded by the DOT on this matter; we believe ultimately that you will find moving this road will not be in the public's interest and you should disapprove the move.

If there is any information we can provide you that would assist you, we would be happy to do it. Please do not hesitate to contact us and thanks very much in advance for your anticipated cooperation in this matter.

Sincerely,

Top

St. Joe company and governments ignore citizens: Panhandle citizens coalition opposes all st. Joe company projects, advances citizen initiatives in 4 cities and calls for referendum in Franklin county

Having received no response from the St. Joe Company and the affected local and state governments to its 'pause for planning', the Panhandle Citizens Coalition (PCC) today outlined their initial campaign against St. Joe Company and various local governments.

PCC announced its opposition to St. Joe Company's development projects and launched citizen initiative campaigns in Carrabelle, Port St. Joe, Panama City and Panama City Beach. For Franklin County, PCC called for a countywide referendum to stop all amendments to its comprehensive plan until a new comprehensive plan is developed with citizen involvement and ultimately approved by the citizens of Franklin County at a future referendum.

PCC Chair John Hedrick stated "St. Joe Company, Governor Jeb Bush and the local and state governments have been ignoring the public's views and are continuing to do so. We as citizens must use our resources and available processes to exert our voices in what happens with us and the best way to show that citizens care to be involved is to demonstrate our resolve to protect our communities and our way of life. St. Joe Company and the local governments otherwise will continue ignoring the public."

PCC had called on St. Joe Company and the local and state governments to have a pause for planning regarding all St. Joe Company properties in the Panhandle as well as other major developments for at least one year to allow time for adequate development and land use planning across the entire region. All St. Joe Company development projects would have been placed on hold during this period. The St. Joe Company and the affected governments ignored the voice of citizens, thus causing the response from PCC.

"Remember who stand to either benefit from or utilize these corporate tourist and corporate development projects." said Hedrick, "For example, St. Joe Company's Watercolor development in Walton County has hotel rooms going for $335 a night and vacation/second homes with $200,000-$1,000,000 price tags. This is far outside the price range of average citizens and their families."

"For the pleasure of having an oceanfront development that would take the average person in Franklin County several life times to pay for, St. Joe Company will directly affect their heritage and their livelihood in the area where they were born and raised." said Victor Lambou of PCC from Wakulla County. "There will be many unemployed and displaced fishermen and women and others who will be hurt by the ecologic damage created by St. Joe Company. They have been made aware of the human impact, the possible destruction of an industry and the livelihood of a community."

"As a native Floridian growing up in Orlando, I have seen first hand what has occurred to Central Florida in the wake of Disney World and all the urban sprawl with its attendant traffic congestion, air pollution, loss of green space, creation of low income jobs, higher taxes and housing priced out of people's reach, among other factors. Now the same things threaten the Panhandle from Jefferson through Walton Counties courtesy of the St. Joe Company's radical decision to simultaneously put large tracts of their property up for potential development. It would be irresponsible and even immoral for someone like me, who has personally seen the disastrious after effects,to stand silent and watch this happen again without energetically trying to stop it." said Hedrick, who more recently has lived in both Tallahassee/Leon County and Jefferson County and works as an attorney in Tallahassee.

"We know this won't be easy." said PCC from Bay County. "We know St. Joe Company, like other developers, exerts a great deal of political influence through, for example, their corporate and their company representatives' campaign contributions to the Bush Brothers (Jeb and George W.) and a host of other politicians on the federal, state and local levels as well as other corporate largesse. And in return for these contributions and largesse, they expect us, the taxpayers, to pay for an unneeded $200 million airport in Bay county, countless other millions for roads in Bay, Washington, Gulf, Calhoun, Jackson and Franklin counties.They also expect us to foot another bill for expanded services which otherwise would not need to be created. This corporate welfare must cease and when it does, we strongly suspect the St. Joe Company projects will suddenly no longer be financially viable." 

"The ballot initiative in Panama City would require the City of Panama City to instruct their Airport Authority to get voter's approval to build or move an airport; otherwise authority members from Panama City and elsewhere may have to be replaced until they seek approval of the voters." said Hedrick. "Likewise, in Carrabelle, Port St. Joe and Panama City Beach, those cities would be prohibited from extending water and sewer service outside the city limits to developments without the express approval of city voters. Additionally, in Port St. Joe, the city would be prohibited from voluntarily annexing property into the City without a vote of their electorate. Our goal is for all of these initiatives to be on the ballot no later than the spring 2003. Finally, in Franklin County we will work to get a countywide referendum which will stop amendments to their comprehensive plan until a new comprehensive plan is developed and adopted with broad citizen input.

These measures will serve as an object lesson for other developers to avoid. St. Joe Company will learn that failure to really involve the local citizens in your plans in meaningful ways will be costly to them." said Hedrick.

Hedrick added that the first wave of these initiative and referendum campaigns will be in full swing before the week is out.
9/3/02

 

Top

August 27, 2002

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE FOR FURTHER INFORMATION:
DRAFT
August 27, 2002 John Hedrick, 850-421-2483
(other contact people)
TOE TO TOE WITH THE ST. JOE COMPANY: PANHANDLE CITIZENS COALITION CALLS FOR PAUSE FOR PLANNING FOR ALL ST. JOE COMPANY PROPERTIES WITH AFFECTED LOCAL AND STATE GOVERNMENTS

The Panhandle Citizens Coalition (PCC) called today for a pause for planning by local and state governments and the St. Joe Company regarding all St. Joe Company properties in the Panhandle for at least one year to allow time for adequate development and land use planning across the entire region. All St. Joe Company development projects and connected road and airport plans and construction would be placed on hold during this period.

"The Panhandle Citizens Coalition was formed due to serious concerns of regional citizens regarding either individual projects of the St. Joe Company or their overall development plans in the Panhandle.

St. Joe Company is the largest developer in Florida and the Panhandle; they have 850-900,000 acres of land available for development. This is an area 30 times larger than Disney and is the largest development activity in Florida since Disney. The known projects already in the works will bring tens of thousands of people to the Panhandle and appear to be on track to create the equivalent of at least an Orlando in the Panhandle." said John Hedrick, Chair of PCC who has lived in both Tallahassee/Leon County and Jefferson County for many years.

"For example, the projected airport near Panama City will be large enough to accommodate a metropolitan area of 4-5 million people, but it is larger than Tampa International. There has been widespread speculation that the St. Joe Company plans to build at least one major tourist attraction in the region--a theme park or a casino--but the company denies that it has such plans. A pattern of projects materializing after the developer had previously denied they existed is reminiscent of how Disney World took hold of the Orlando area. And remember, Disney is the former corporate home of St. Joe Company CEO Peter Rummel. It would seem, with the expansive airport and roadways proposed by St. Joe Company or its proxies, that the St. Joe company must have as yet undisclosed grandiose plans, in addition to its residential and commercial development. We say to the St. Joe Company, let's get it all on the table NOW so adequate planning can be done." Hedrick continued.

"There has been no comprehensive review of all of St. Joe Company's activity by any government body. The only reviews have been on one project at a time by individual local governments. No responsible agency has considered the overall regional impact of all St. Joe Company proposed developments combined. We've been informed that St. Joe Company plans ahead at least 2-3 decades due to their previous involvement with timber and they have had their plans for a long time. " said Sandra Allen of PCC from Eastpoint in Franklin County.

" Is there a new, improved St. Joe Company? St. Joe Company doesn't believe its plans need any fundamental revision whereas we feel exactly the opposite. The citizens of the Panhandle most adversely impacted by these developments did not bargain for this to happen to them. In St. Joe Company's own words, their plans fundamentally change the character of all the existing communities and the Panhandle as a whole. We know many of these changes will have negative impacts on our communities, governments and our quality of life. " stated PCC from Bay County.

"For example, in Franklin County this could extend to wiping out an entire way of life. Any large scale development on or near the water could signal death for the commercial and recreational fishermen and women of all of Northwest Florida. This is not inconsequential, as according to the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, in 2000, saltwater and freshwater fishing along with hunting and wildlife viewing generated $53 million in total expenditures annually in Franklin County alone, which resulted in a total economic impact on the County of almost $95 million, and created 1,268 full time jobs. As we should remember, Tampa Bay and Chesapeake Bay were also once fishing communities. " said Allen.

"St. Joe Company stands to make billions off their development projects- an
estimated 100 million on the Franklin project and $500 million on the Gulf project alone- yet is offering very little to the affected communities to defray development impacts, expecting the local, state and federal taxpayers to pick up the tabs. St. Joe Company, just like many other developers, is only doing what is in their best interests (making money for themselves and their stockholders) and not taking into account the citizenry as a whole. In fact, by the design of their upscale, high-end projects, St. Joe Company seems to pit the rich and powerful against the rest of the citizens." said Hedrick.

"A pause for planning is essential to digest the breath and scope of all St, Joe Company's plans. A pause for planning will allow time for better public participation and will put the decision-making into the hands of the citizens, not one major developer." said Tim Turner with PCC from Apalachicola in Franklin County.

" Letters to affected local governments, the Governor and St. Joe Company have been sent outlining the pause for planning and if they either do not respond quickly or reject the call for the pause, then you will see us again shortly outlining what will happen next. Stay tuned and in the meantime, we would urge all citizens to contact their local and state officials to put pressure on them to adopt the pause." said Hedrick in conclusion.

Top

SAMPLE ORDINANCE RESOLUTION FROM PANHANDLE CITIZENS COALITION


An Ordinance Resolution of the Board of County Commissioners of Bay County Florida adopting a Pause for Planning


WHEREAS, the proposed developments by the St. Joe Company, in conjunction with other developers, will overwhelm the ability of Bay County to keep up with growth due to the developments' sheer volume, accelerating growth way beyond normal rates, creating a physical emergency for the county; and

WHEREAS the aforementioned developments, if not properly planned and constructed, will cause major environmental problems with area water bodies, the fish within them, coastal corridors and wildlife habitat; and

WHEREAS the aforementioned developments, if not properly planned and constructed, will cause severe economic dislocations within our community in the form of lost jobs and potential destruction of industries, forcing an exodus of indigenous people and thus threatening the general welfare and quality of life of our community; and

WHEREAS certain proposed developments in coastal flooding areas pose significant threats to the public's safety and health; and

WHEREAS the substantial increases in permanent and seasonal populations resulting from the proposed developments will significantly impact already inadequate hurricane shelters and evacuation routes across the region; and

WHEREAS, all the aforementioned developments have not been reviewed as an entire package by the Board of County Commissioners or staff or any one government for that matter; and

WHEREAS, the county has not reviewed impact fees or fee rate changes that will be necessary to handle the aforementioned developments, creating a fiscal emergency for the county; and

WHEREAS the existing impact fees and fee rates will be inadequate to handle the permitted and proposed projects under consideration by the Bay County Commission; and

WHEREAS, this process of analyzing the problems, creating the infrastructure capacity and developing appropriate impact fees and fee structures is expected to take at least a year and perhaps a lengthier period of time; and

WHEREAS the state and federal governments will spend tens of millions of dollars on new roadways through grants to Opportunity Florida, Florida's Great Northwest and possibly other organizations that in large part represent the interests of large developers and thus will further accelerate inadequately planned developments; and

WHEREAS the feasibility and environmental studies of these new roads are being conducted by a company that is both a contractor to the state as well as St. Joe Company and Opportunity Florida (Post, Buckley, Schuh and Jernigan), thus compromising their ability to render unbiased analyzes of the necessity and design of these new roads; and

WHEREAS the federal and state government plan to subsidize construction of a new airport in a hitherto undeveloped region of Bay County that will require yet further massive infrastructure; and

WHEREAS allocation for all these resources already has stretched to the breaking point the coffers and technical review capabilities of local governments.

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of County Commissioners of Bay County, Florida hereby adopts a countywide pause for planning and development on all development projects not currently permitted by a development order with the exception of those permits that have minimal or no effect on the conditions giving rise to the pause, those conditions being, for example, building in coastal high hazard areas, densities greater than permitted under the comprehensive plan, and building in environmentally sensitive areas. The new and relocated roads and airport which large developers desire the state and federal governments to fund specifically fall within this pause ordinance.

This pause for planning shall last for at least a year and/or until such time as the County Commission thoroughly analyzes all potential impacts, develops and adopts appropriate remedies, including density/intensity standards, impact fees and fee structures and assesses the infrastructure capacity which would bring the services' capacities into concurrence. This pause for planning is specifically ordered to be in effect in all municipalities in this county unless and until a municipality decides to opt out of this ordinance by passage of their own pause for planning ordinance based on this resolution.

DONE AND ORDERED THIS _______ DAY OF ________, 2002.

Top

News Clips

Tallahassee Democrat: Opponents of St. Joe use poor approach
It's hardly surprising that The St. Joe Co.'s "Great Northwest" has incited opposition and even outrage from some Floridians. The developer's vision for thousands of homes, a new airport and the re-routing of a major Panhandle highway is sweeping. It would obviously have a major impact on this region.... 8/29/02

Slow growth group calls on St. Joe to halt developments
TALLAHASSEE — A group of Panhandle slow-growth activists on Tuesday asked the St. Joe Company to halt its developments in the Panhandle for a year to better determine how the area will be changed by the company's plans. St. Joe, the largest landholder in the state, has several development proposals from Tallahassee to Destin.... 8/28/02

Group seeks slow Panhandle growth
Activists want a one-year delay on work by the St. Joe Co., the state's largest landowner.... 8/28/02

State asked to stop St. Joe Co.'s development
Outraged by The St. Joe Co.'s proposed developments across the Florida Panhandle, a new group is calling on the state to halt development projects across the region for at least a year.... 8/28/02

 (Top) 

info:     email info@whoseflorida.com

   (Top)  (Home)